<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
 <channel>
  <title>AT2k Design BBS - Slashdot</title>
  <description>AT2k Design BBS</description>
  <link>http://mail.vadvbbs.com/web-bbs/forums/forum-dispmsg.php?t=39&amp;d=3</link>
  <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2026 01:14:06 -0500</pubDate>
  <item>
   <title>Emails To Outlook.com Rejected By Faulty Or Overzealous Blocking</title>
   <description>From:    VRSS @1 *1&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
To:      All @ *0&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Subject: Emails To Outlook.com Rejected By Faulty Or Overzealous Blocking&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Feed: Slashdot&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Feed Link: &lt;a href=&quot;https://slashdot.org/&quot;&gt;https://slashdot.org/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
---&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Title: Emails To Outlook.com Rejected By Faulty Or Overzealous Blocking Rules&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Link: &lt;a href=&quot;https://tech.slashdot.org/story/26/03/04/1844224/emails-to-outlookcom-rejected-by-faulty-or-overzealous-blocking-rules?utm_source=rss1.0mainlinkanon&amp;utm_medium=feed&quot;&gt;https://tech.slashdot.org/story/26/03/04/1844...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Microsoft spent much of the past week rejecting legitimate emails sent to&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Outlook.com, Live, and Hotmail accounts due to what appears to be overly&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
aggressive IP reputation filtering or faulty blocklist rules. According to&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
The Register, many senders received 550 errors claiming their networks were&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
blocked, preventing delivery of invoices, notifications, and authentication&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
emails. From the report: A block list is a good thing. It helps stem the flow&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
of spam from networks or addresses associated with junk email. However, the&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
confusing thing for our reader is that his company was not on Microsoft&amp;#039;s&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
naughty step for email. A look at Microsoft&amp;#039;s Smart Network Data Service&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
(SNDS) showed no issues with the IP. &amp;quot;We&amp;#039;re also a member of their JMRP (Junk&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Mail Reporting Program),&amp;quot; our reader added, &amp;quot;which is intended to inform us&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
when people are reporting spam sent from our IPs - except, we never get any&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
reports.&amp;quot; The problem worsened in February. On Microsoft&amp;#039;s support forums,&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
users began to complain about similar issues as the IP net presumably&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
widened. One wrote: &amp;quot;We are currently experiencing a critical and recurring&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
email delivery issue affecting recipients at outlook.com, live.com,&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
hotmail.com, and msn.com,&amp;quot; and provided a copy of an error that suggested the&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
mail server has been &amp;quot;temporarily rate limited due to IP reputation.&amp;quot; The&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
user drily noted, &amp;quot;Although the error indicates rate limiting, in practice no&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
emails are being delivered.&amp;quot; A large number of users, ranging from the&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
administrator of a server sending automated notifications on behalf of&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Estonian Public Libraries to an email provider for healthcare professionals,&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
chimed in to confirm they too were having delivery problems and Microsoft&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
support was not helpful. [...] Unsurprisingly, our reader spoke on condition&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
of anonymity - nobody wants to be the ISP that has to say, &amp;quot;Yeah, we can&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
deliver your email anywhere but Outlook.com&amp;quot; to customers. We asked Microsoft&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
to comment, but other than acknowledging our questions, the company did not&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
respond further.&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Read more of this story at Slashdot.&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
---&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
VRSS v2.1.180528</description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2026 13:20:04 -0600</pubDate>
   <link>http://mail.vadvbbs.com/web-bbs/forums/forum-viewmsg.php?t=39&amp;d=3&amp;m=100</link>
   <guid>http://mail.vadvbbs.com/web-bbs/forums/forum-viewmsg.php?t=39&amp;d=3&amp;m=100</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title>TikTok Says End-To-End Encryption Makes Users Less Safe</title>
   <description>From:    VRSS @1 *1&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
To:      All @ *0&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Subject: TikTok Says End-To-End Encryption Makes Users Less Safe&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Feed: Slashdot&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Feed Link: &lt;a href=&quot;https://slashdot.org/&quot;&gt;https://slashdot.org/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
---&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Title: TikTok Says End-To-End Encryption Makes Users Less Safe&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Link: &lt;a href=&quot;https://tech.slashdot.org/story/26/03/04/1638248/tiktok-says-end-to-end-encryption-makes-users-less-safe?utm_source=rss1.0mainlinkanon&amp;utm_medium=feed&quot;&gt;https://tech.slashdot.org/story/26/03/04/1638...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
An anonymous reader quotes a report from the BBC: TikTok will not introduce&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
end-to-end encryption (E2EE) -- the controversial privacy feature used by&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
nearly all its rivals -- arguing it makes users less safe. E2EE means only&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
the sender and recipient of a direct message can view its contents, making it&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
the most secure form of communication available to the general public.&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Platforms such as Facebook, Instagram, Messenger and X have embraced it&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
because they say their priority is maximizing user privacy. But critics have&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
said E2EE makes it harder to stop harmful content spreading online, because&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
it means tech firms and law enforcement have no way of viewing any material&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
sent in direct messages. The situation is made more complex because TikTok&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
has long faced accusations that ties to the Chinese state may put users&amp;#039; data&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
at risk. TikTok has consistently denied this, but earlier this year the&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
social media firm&amp;#039;s US operations were separated from its global business on&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
the orders of US lawmakers. TikTok told the BBC it believed end-to-end&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
encryption prevented police and safety teams from being able to read direct&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
messages if they needed to. It confirmed its approach to the BBC in a&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
briefing about security at its London office, saying it wanted to protect&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
users, especially young people from harm. It described this stance as a&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
deliberate decision to set itself apart from rivals. &amp;quot;Grooming and harassment&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
risks are very real in DMs [direct messages] so TikTok now can credibly argue&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
that it&amp;#039;s prioritizing &amp;#039;proactive safety&amp;#039; over &amp;#039;privacy absolutism&amp;#039; which is&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
a pretty powerful soundbite,&amp;quot; said social media industry analyst Matt&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Navarra. But Navarra said the move also &amp;quot;puts TikTok out of step with global&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
privacy expectations&amp;quot; and might reinforce wariness for some about its&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
ownership.&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Read more of this story at Slashdot.&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
---&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
VRSS v2.1.180528</description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2026 12:20:03 -0600</pubDate>
   <link>http://mail.vadvbbs.com/web-bbs/forums/forum-viewmsg.php?t=39&amp;d=3&amp;m=99</link>
   <guid>http://mail.vadvbbs.com/web-bbs/forums/forum-viewmsg.php?t=39&amp;d=3&amp;m=99</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title>Apple Announces Low-Cost &amp;#039;MacBook Neo&amp;#039; With A18 Pro Chip</title>
   <description>From:    VRSS @1 *1&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
To:      All @ *0&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Subject: Apple Announces Low-Cost &amp;#039;MacBook Neo&amp;#039; With A18 Pro Chip&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Feed: Slashdot&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Feed Link: &lt;a href=&quot;https://slashdot.org/&quot;&gt;https://slashdot.org/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
---&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Title: Apple Announces Low-Cost &amp;#039;MacBook Neo&amp;#039; With A18 Pro Chip&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Link: &lt;a href=&quot;https://hardware.slashdot.org/story/26/03/04/1624211/apple-announces-low-cost-macbook-neo-with-a18-pro-chip?utm_source=rss1.0mainlinkanon&amp;utm_medium=feed&quot;&gt;https://hardware.slashdot.org/story/26/03/04/...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Continuing its product launches this week, Apple today announced the &amp;quot;MacBook&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Neo,&amp;quot; an all-new, low-cost Mac featuring the A18 Pro chip. It starts at $599&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
and begins shipping on Wednesday, March 11. MacRumors reports: The MacBook&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Neo is the first Mac to be powered by an iPhone chip; the A18 Pro debuted in&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
2024&amp;#039;s iPhone 16 Pro models. Apple says it is up to 50% faster for everyday&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
tasks than the bestselling PC with the latest shipping Intel Core Ultra 5, up&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
to 3x faster for on-device AI workloads, and up to 2x faster for tasks like&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
photo editing. The MacBook Neo features a 13-inch Liquid Retina display with&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
a 2408-by-1506 resolution, 500 nits of brightness, and an anti-reflective&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
coating. The display does not have a notch, instead featuring uniform, iPad-&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
style bezels. It is available in Silver, Indigo, Blush, and Citrus color&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
options. The colored finishes extend to the Magic Keyboard in lighter shades&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
and come with matching wallpapers. It weighs 2.7 pounds. There are two USB-C&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
ports. One is a USB-C 2 port with support for speeds up to 480 Mb/s and one&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
is a USB-C 3 port with support for speeds up to 10 Gb/s. There is also a&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
headphone jack. The MacBook Neo also offers a 16-hour battery life, 8GB of&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
unified memory, Wi-Fi 6E and Bluetooth 6 connectivity, a 1080p front-facing&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
camera, dual mics with directional beamforming, and dual side-firing speakers&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
with Spatial Audio.&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Read more of this story at Slashdot.&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
---&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
VRSS v2.1.180528</description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2026 11:20:03 -0600</pubDate>
   <link>http://mail.vadvbbs.com/web-bbs/forums/forum-viewmsg.php?t=39&amp;d=3&amp;m=98</link>
   <guid>http://mail.vadvbbs.com/web-bbs/forums/forum-viewmsg.php?t=39&amp;d=3&amp;m=98</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title>Intel&amp;#039;s Make-Or-Break 18A Process Node Debuts For Data Center Wi</title>
   <description>From:    VRSS @1 *1&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
To:      All @ *0&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Subject: Intel&amp;#039;s Make-Or-Break 18A Process Node Debuts For Data Center Wi&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Feed: Slashdot&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Feed Link: &lt;a href=&quot;https://slashdot.org/&quot;&gt;https://slashdot.org/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
---&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Title: Intel&amp;#039;s Make-Or-Break 18A Process Node Debuts For Data Center With 288-&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Core Xeon 6+ CPU&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Link: &lt;a href=&quot;https://hardware.slashdot.org/story/26/03/04/0048212/intels-make-or-break-18a-process-node-debuts-for-data-center-with-288-core-xeon-6-cpu?utm_source=rss1.0mainlinkanon&amp;utm_medium=feed&quot;&gt;https://hardware.slashdot.org/story/26/03/04/...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Intel has formally unveiled its Xeon 6+ &amp;quot;Clearwater Forest&amp;quot; data-center&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
processor with up to 288 cores, built on the company&amp;#039;s new Intel 18A process&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
and using Foveros Direct packaging. The chip targets telecom, cloud, and edge-&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
AI workloads with massive parallelism, large caches, and high-bandwidth DDR5-&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
8000 memory. Tom&amp;#039;s Hardware reports: Intel&amp;#039;s Xeon 6+ processors with up to&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
288 cores combine 12 compute chiplets containing 24 energy-efficient Darkmont&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
cores per tile that are produced using 18A manufacturing technology, two I/O&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
tiles made on Intel 7 production node, as well as three active base tiles&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
made on Intel 3 fabrication process. The compute tiles are stacked on top of&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
the base dies using Intel&amp;#039;s Foveros Direct 3D technology, whereas lateral&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
connections are enabled by Intel&amp;#039;s EMIB bridges. Intel&amp;#039;s &amp;#039;Darkmont&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
efficiency cores have received rather meaningful microarchitectural upgrades.&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Each core integrates a 64 KB L1 instruction cache, a broader fetch and decode&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
pipeline, and a deeper out-of-order engine capable of tracking more in-flight&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
operations. The number of execution ports has also been increased in a bid to&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
improve both scalar and vector throughput under heavily threaded server&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
workloads. From a cache hierarchy standpoint, the design groups cores into&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
four-core blocks that share approximately 4 MB of L2 cache per block. As a&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
result, the aggregate last-level cache across the full package surpasses 1&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
GB, roughly 1,152 MB in total. This unusually large pool is intended to keep&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
data close to hundreds of active cores and reduce dependence on external&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
memory bandwidth, which in turn is meant to both increase performance and&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
lower power consumption. Platform-wise, the processor remains drop-in&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
compatible with the current Xeon server socket, so the CPU has 12 memory&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
channels that support DDR5-8000, 96 PCIe 5.0 lanes with 64 lanes supporting&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
CXL 2.0.&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Read more of this story at Slashdot.&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
---&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
VRSS v2.1.180528</description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2026 10:20:04 -0600</pubDate>
   <link>http://mail.vadvbbs.com/web-bbs/forums/forum-viewmsg.php?t=39&amp;d=3&amp;m=97</link>
   <guid>http://mail.vadvbbs.com/web-bbs/forums/forum-viewmsg.php?t=39&amp;d=3&amp;m=97</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title>New App Alerts You If Someone Nearby Is Wearing Smart Glasses</title>
   <description>From:    VRSS @1 *1&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
To:      All @ *0&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Subject: New App Alerts You If Someone Nearby Is Wearing Smart Glasses&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Feed: Slashdot&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Feed Link: &lt;a href=&quot;https://slashdot.org/&quot;&gt;https://slashdot.org/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
---&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Title: New App Alerts You If Someone Nearby Is Wearing Smart Glasses&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Link: &lt;a href=&quot;https://yro.slashdot.org/story/26/03/03/2343215/new-app-alerts-you-if-someone-nearby-is-wearing-smart-glasses?utm_source=rss1.0mainlinkanon&amp;utm_medium=feed&quot;&gt;https://yro.slashdot.org/story/26/03/03/23432...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
A new Android app called Nearby Glasses alerts users when Bluetooth signals&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
from smart glasses are detected nearby. The Android app, called Nearby&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Glasses, &amp;quot;launches at a time as there is an increasing resistance against&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
always-recording or listening devices, which critics say process information&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
about nearby people who do not give their consent,&amp;quot; reports TechCrunch. From&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
the report: Yves Jeanrenaud, who made the app, first spoke to 404 Media about&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
the project and said he was in part inspired to make Nearby Glasses after&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
reading the independent publication&amp;#039;s reporting into wearable surveillance&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
devices, including how Meta&amp;#039;s Ray-Ban smart glasses have been used in&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
immigration raids and to film and harass sex workers. On the app&amp;#039;s project&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
page, Jeanrenaud described smart glasses as an &amp;quot;intolerable intrusion,&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
consent neglecting, horrible piece of tech.&amp;quot; Jeanrenaud told TechCrunch in an&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
email that his motivation came from &amp;quot;witnessing the sheer scale and inhumane&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
nature of the abuse these smart glasses are involved in.&amp;quot; Jeanrenaud also&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
cited Meta&amp;#039;s decision to implement face recognition as a default feature in&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
its smart glasses, &amp;quot;which I consider to be a huge floodgate pushed open for&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
all kinds of privacy-invasive behavior.&amp;quot; The app works by listening for&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
nearby Bluetooth signals that contain a publicly assigned identifier unique&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
to the Bluetooth device&amp;#039;s manufacturer. If the app detects a Bluetooth signal&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
from a nearby hardware device made by Meta or Snap, the app will send the&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
user an alert. (The app also allows users to add their own specific Bluetooth&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
identifiers, allowing the user to detect a broader range of wearable&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
surveillance gadgetry.) Further reading: Meta&amp;#039;s AI Display Glasses Reportedly&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Share Intimate Videos With Human Moderators&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Read more of this story at Slashdot.&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
---&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
VRSS v2.1.180528</description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2026 09:20:04 -0600</pubDate>
   <link>http://mail.vadvbbs.com/web-bbs/forums/forum-viewmsg.php?t=39&amp;d=3&amp;m=96</link>
   <guid>http://mail.vadvbbs.com/web-bbs/forums/forum-viewmsg.php?t=39&amp;d=3&amp;m=96</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title>Qualcomm CEO: &amp;#039;Resistance Is Futile&amp;#039; As 6G Mobile Revolution App</title>
   <description>From:    VRSS @1 *1&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
To:      All @ *0&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Subject: Qualcomm CEO: &amp;#039;Resistance Is Futile&amp;#039; As 6G Mobile Revolution App&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Feed: Slashdot&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Feed Link: &lt;a href=&quot;https://slashdot.org/&quot;&gt;https://slashdot.org/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
---&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Title: Qualcomm CEO: &amp;#039;Resistance Is Futile&amp;#039; As 6G Mobile Revolution&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Approaches&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Link: &lt;a href=&quot;https://tech.slashdot.org/story/26/03/04/0033216/qualcomm-ceo-resistance-is-futile-as-6g-mobile-revolution-approaches?utm_source=rss1.0mainlinkanon&amp;utm_medium=feed&quot;&gt;https://tech.slashdot.org/story/26/03/04/0033...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
At Mobile World Congress, Cristiano Amon of Qualcomm argued that the coming&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
6G networks will power an AI-driven &amp;quot;agent economy,&amp;quot; where devices and AI&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
assistants constantly communicate across the network. &amp;quot;AI will fundamentally&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
change our mobile experiences,&amp;quot; Qualcomm chief executive, Cristiano Amon&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
says. &amp;quot;It&amp;#039;s going to change how we think about our smartphones. Think about&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
our personal computing. Think about and interact with a car. The car is now a&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
computing surface. If you actually believe in the AI revolution, 6G will be&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
required. Resistance is futile.&amp;quot; The company says early consumer testing&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
could begin around the 2028 Los Angeles Olympics, with broader rollouts&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
expected by 2029. Fortune&amp;#039;s Kamal Ahmed reports: Akash Palkhiwala is&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Qualcomm&amp;#039;s chief financial officer and chief operating officer. I spent some&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
time with him at the company&amp;#039;s stand, as his leading engineers took me&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
through a 6G future where individuals will have real-time information&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
delivered to them via their glasses. Palkhiwala compliments me on my watch,&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
which only does one thing. It tells me the time. &amp;quot;6G is going to be the first&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
time that connectivity and AI come together in the network. What we&amp;#039;re&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
building is the first AI-native wireless network that&amp;#039;s ever been built,&amp;quot; he&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
explains. &amp;quot;The traffic that we expect on 6G is way different than what we had&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
before,&amp;quot; says Palkhiwala. &amp;quot;Before, it was all about consumer traffic. We&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
expect 6G to be driven by [AI] agent traffic. Think about all these use cases&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
where there are AI agents sitting on various devices -- your glasses, your&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
watch, your phone, your PC. These agents are going to be talking back and&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
forth across the network to other agents and services. &amp;quot;The traffic&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
completely changes. 6G is being built with this idea that the traffic that&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
goes on the network is not just going to be consumer voice calls or&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
downloading videos, we&amp;#039;re going to have agents talking to each other, so the&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
reliability of the network becomes very important.&amp;quot; On-device capabilities&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
(the ability of your phone to process far more data); edge computing (locally&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
sourced IT technology rather than distant data centers); more efficient use&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
of available bandwidth (AI-enabled load control); and greater cloud access&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
will all come together to produce a new wireless network. [...] &amp;quot;Today we are&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
in the application economy,&amp;quot; he notes. &amp;quot;On the phone, you want to make a&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
travel reservation, you go to one application. You want to order an Uber, you&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
go to a second application. You want to order food, you go to a third&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
application, movie tickets, etc. The user has to go through that effort. In&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
the future, you think of the app economy moving over to an agent economy,&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
where there&amp;#039;s one agent I&amp;#039;m interacting with, and I can ask that agent to&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
book me a movie ticket or a plane ticket, to order food for me, get an Uber&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
for me. It knows everything about me.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Read more of this story at Slashdot.&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
---&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
VRSS v2.1.180528</description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2026 08:20:04 -0600</pubDate>
   <link>http://mail.vadvbbs.com/web-bbs/forums/forum-viewmsg.php?t=39&amp;d=3&amp;m=95</link>
   <guid>http://mail.vadvbbs.com/web-bbs/forums/forum-viewmsg.php?t=39&amp;d=3&amp;m=95</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title>ChatGPT Gets GPT-5.3 Instant Update With Less &amp;#039;Cringe,&amp;#039; Fewer Ha</title>
   <description>From:    VRSS @1 *1&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
To:      All @ *0&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Subject: ChatGPT Gets GPT-5.3 Instant Update With Less &amp;#039;Cringe,&amp;#039; Fewer Ha&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Feed: Slashdot&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Feed Link: &lt;a href=&quot;https://slashdot.org/&quot;&gt;https://slashdot.org/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
---&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Title: ChatGPT Gets GPT-5.3 Instant Update With Less &amp;#039;Cringe,&amp;#039; Fewer&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Hallucinations&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Link: &lt;a href=&quot;https://slashdot.org/story/26/03/04/0017232/chatgpt-gets-gpt-53-instant-update-with-less-cringe-fewer-hallucinations?utm_source=rss1.0mainlinkanon&amp;utm_medium=feed&quot;&gt;https://slashdot.org/story/26/03/04/0017232/c...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
An anonymous reader quotes a report from MacRumors: OpenAI today updated its&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
most popular ChatGPT model, debuting GPT-5.3 Instant. GPT-5.3 Instant is&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
supposed to provide more accurate answers and better contextualized results&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
when searching the web. The update also cuts down on unnecessary dead ends,&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
caveats, and overly declarative phrasing, plus it has fewer hallucinations.&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
According to OpenAI, it tweaked the Instant model to address complaints about&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
tone, relevance, and conversational flow, which are issues that don&amp;#039;t show up&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
in benchmarks. GPT-5.2 Instant had a &amp;quot;cringe&amp;quot; tone that could be overbearing&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
or make unsubstantiated assumptions about user intent or emotions. The new&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
model will have a more natural conversational style and will cut back on&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
dramatic phrases like &amp;quot;Stop. Take a breath.&amp;quot; Users found that GPT-5.2 Instant&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
would refuse questions it should have been able to answer, or respond in ways&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
that felt overly cautious around sensitive topics. GPT-5.3 Instant cuts down&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
on refusals and tones down overly defensive or moralizing preambles when&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
answering a question. The model will no longer &amp;quot;over-caveat&amp;quot; after assuming&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
bad intent from the user. GPT-5.3 Instant also provides higher-quality&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
answers based on information from the web. OpenAI says that it is able to&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
better balance what it finds online with its own knowledge, so it is less&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
likely to overindex on web results.&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Read more of this story at Slashdot.&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
---&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
VRSS v2.1.180528</description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2026 07:20:04 -0600</pubDate>
   <link>http://mail.vadvbbs.com/web-bbs/forums/forum-viewmsg.php?t=39&amp;d=3&amp;m=94</link>
   <guid>http://mail.vadvbbs.com/web-bbs/forums/forum-viewmsg.php?t=39&amp;d=3&amp;m=94</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title>&amp;#039;Game of Thrones&amp;#039; Movie In the Works</title>
   <description>From:    VRSS @1 *1&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
To:      All @ *0&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Subject: &amp;#039;Game of Thrones&amp;#039; Movie In the Works&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Feed: Slashdot&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Feed Link: &lt;a href=&quot;https://slashdot.org/&quot;&gt;https://slashdot.org/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
---&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Title: &amp;#039;Game of Thrones&amp;#039; Movie In the Works&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Link: &lt;a href=&quot;https://entertainment.slashdot.org/story/26/03/04/0013218/game-of-thrones-movie-in-the-works?utm_source=rss1.0mainlinkanon&amp;utm_medium=feed&quot;&gt;https://entertainment.slashdot.org/story/26/0...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Warner Bros. is developing a feature film set in the world of Game of Thrones&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
with writer Beau Willimon of Andor and House of Cards. &amp;quot;That&amp;#039;s about all we&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
know right now, and as with everything &amp;#039;Thrones&amp;#039; things could change, but the&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
film is firmly in development,&amp;quot; reports TheWrap. Page Six Hollywood was first&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
to break the news and speculated that the story could revolve around Aegon I,&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
the legendary Targaryen king who spawned a dynasty. From the report: The&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Targaryens have been at the center of all things &amp;quot;Thrones&amp;quot; on HBO, with &amp;quot;Game&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
of Thrones&amp;quot; following Daenerys Targaryen&amp;#039;s (Emilia Clarke) quest to usurp the&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
throne, spinoff &amp;quot;House of the Dragon&amp;quot; set in the midst of the Targaryens&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
reign and recent spinoff &amp;quot;A Knight of the Seven Kingdoms&amp;quot; following the&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
squire-ship of Aegon &amp;quot;Egg&amp;quot; Targaryen towards the end of the family&amp;#039;s run atop&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
the Iron Throne. All, of course, based on George R.R. Martin&amp;#039;s expansive book&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
universe.&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Read more of this story at Slashdot.&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
---&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
VRSS v2.1.180528</description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2026 04:20:03 -0600</pubDate>
   <link>http://mail.vadvbbs.com/web-bbs/forums/forum-viewmsg.php?t=39&amp;d=3&amp;m=93</link>
   <guid>http://mail.vadvbbs.com/web-bbs/forums/forum-viewmsg.php?t=39&amp;d=3&amp;m=93</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title>NASA Repairs Artemis 2 Rocket, Continues Eyeing April Moon Launc</title>
   <description>From:    VRSS @1 *1&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
To:      All @ *0&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Subject: NASA Repairs Artemis 2 Rocket, Continues Eyeing April Moon Launc&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Feed: Slashdot&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Feed Link: &lt;a href=&quot;https://slashdot.org/&quot;&gt;https://slashdot.org/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
---&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Title: NASA Repairs Artemis 2 Rocket, Continues Eyeing April Moon Launch&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Link: &lt;a href=&quot;https://science.slashdot.org/story/26/03/03/2358209/nasa-repairs-artemis-2-rocket-continues-eyeing-april-moon-launch?utm_source=rss1.0mainlinkanon&amp;utm_medium=feed&quot;&gt;https://science.slashdot.org/story/26/03/03/2...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
NASA is eyeing an April launch window for the upcoming Artemis II mission&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
after it repaired a helium-flow issue on the Space Launch System upper stage&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
rocket. &amp;quot;Work on the rocket and spacecraft will continue in the coming weeks&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
as NASA prepares for rolling the rocket out to the launch pad again later&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
this month ahead of a potential launch in April,&amp;quot; NASA wrote in an update on&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Tuesday. Space.com reports: The repair work occurred inside the huge Vehicle&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Assembly Building (VAB) at NASA&amp;#039;s Kennedy Space Center (KSC) in Florida.&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Artemis 2&amp;#039;s SLS and Orion crew capsule have been in the VAB since Feb. 25,&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
when they rolled back to the hangar from KSC&amp;#039;s Launch Pad 39B. Just a few&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
days earlier, the Artemis 2 stack successfully completed a wet dress&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
rehearsal, a two-day-long practice run of the procedures leading up to&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
launch. In the wake of that test, however, NASA noticed an interruption in&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
helium flow in the SLS&amp;#039; upper stage. That was a significant issue, because&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
helium pressurizes the rocket&amp;#039;s propellant tanks. Rollback was the only&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
option, as the affected area in the upper stage was not accessible at the&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
pad. The problem took a potential March launch out of play for Artemis 2,&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
which will send four astronauts on a roughly 10-day flight around the moon.&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
It will be the first crewed flight to the lunar neighborhood since Apollo 17&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
in 1972. The next Artemis 2 launch window opens in April, with liftoff&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
opportunities on April 1, April 3-6 and April 30. And those options&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
apparently remain in play, thanks to recent work in the VAB. That work&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
centered on a seal in an interface through which helium flows from ground&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
equipment into the SLS upper stage. That seal was obstructing the interface,&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
which is known as a quick disconnect.&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Read more of this story at Slashdot.&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
---&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
VRSS v2.1.180528</description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2026 01:20:04 -0600</pubDate>
   <link>http://mail.vadvbbs.com/web-bbs/forums/forum-viewmsg.php?t=39&amp;d=3&amp;m=92</link>
   <guid>http://mail.vadvbbs.com/web-bbs/forums/forum-viewmsg.php?t=39&amp;d=3&amp;m=92</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title>A Possible US Government iPhone-Hacking Toolkit Is Now In the Ha</title>
   <description>From:    VRSS @1 *1&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
To:      All @ *0&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Subject: A Possible US Government iPhone-Hacking Toolkit Is Now In the Ha&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Feed: Slashdot&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Feed Link: &lt;a href=&quot;https://slashdot.org/&quot;&gt;https://slashdot.org/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
---&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Title: A Possible US Government iPhone-Hacking Toolkit Is Now In the Hands of&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Foreign Spies, Criminals&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Link: &lt;a href=&quot;https://apple.slashdot.org/story/26/03/03/2049253/a-possible-us-government-iphone-hacking-toolkit-is-now-in-the-hands-of-foreign-spies-criminals?utm_source=rss1.0mainlinkanon&amp;utm_medium=feed&quot;&gt;https://apple.slashdot.org/story/26/03/03/204...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Security researchers say a highly sophisticated iPhone exploitation toolkit&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
dubbed &amp;quot;Coruna,&amp;quot; which possibly originated from a U.S. government contractor,&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
has spread from suspected Russian espionage operations to crypto-stealing&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
criminal campaigns. Apple has patched the exploited vulnerabilities in newer&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
iOS versions, but tens of thousands of devices may have already been&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
compromised. An anonymous reader quotes an excerpt from Wired&amp;#039;s report:&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Security researchers at Google on Tuesday released a report describing what&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
they&amp;#039;re calling &amp;quot;Coruna,&amp;quot; a highly sophisticated iPhone hacking toolkit that&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
includes five complete hacking techniques capable of bypassing all the&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
defenses of an iPhone to silently install malware on a device when it visits&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
a website containing the exploitation code. In total, Coruna takes advantage&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
of 23 distinct vulnerabilities in iOS, a rare collection of hacking&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
components that suggests it was created by a well-resourced, likely state-&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
sponsored group of hackers. In fact, Google traces components of Coruna to&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
hacking techniques it spotted in use in February of last year and attributed&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
to what it describes only as a &amp;quot;customer of a surveillance company.&amp;quot; Then,&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
five months later, Google says a more complete version of Coruna reappeared&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
in what appears to have been an espionage campaign carried out by a suspected&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Russian spy group, which hid the hacking code in a common visitor-counting&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
component of Ukrainian websites. Finally, Google spotted Coruna in use yet&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
again in what seems to have been a purely profit-focused hacking campaign,&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
infecting Chinese-language crypto and gambling sites to deliver malware that&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
steals victims cryptocurrency. Conspicuously absent from Google&amp;#039;s report is&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
any mention of who the original surveillance company &amp;quot;customer&amp;quot; that deployed&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Coruna may have been. But the mobile security company iVerify, which also&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
analyzed a version of Coruna it obtained from one of the infected Chinese&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
sites, suggests the code may well have started life as a hacking kit built&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
for or purchased by the US government. Google and iVerify both note that&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Coruna contains multiple components previously used in a hacking operation&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
known as &amp;quot;Triangulation&amp;quot; that was discovered targeting Russian cybersecurity&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
firm Kaspersky in 2023, which the Russian government claimed was the work of&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
the NSA. (The US government didn&amp;#039;t respond to Russia&amp;#039;s claim.) Coruna&amp;#039;s code&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
also appears to have been originally written by English-speaking coders,&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
notes iVerify&amp;#039;s cofounder Rocky Cole. &amp;quot;It&amp;#039;s highly sophisticated, took&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
millions of dollars to develop, and it bears the hallmarks of other modules&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
that have been publicly attributed to the US government,&amp;quot; Cole tells WIRED.&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&amp;quot;This is the first example we&amp;#039;ve seen of very likely US government tools --&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
based on what the code is telling us -- spinning out of control and being&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
used by both our adversaries and cybercriminal groups.&amp;quot; Regardless of&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Coruna&amp;#039;s origin, Google warns that a highly valuable and rare hacking toolkit&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
appears to have traveled through a series of unlikely hands, and now exists&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
in the wild where it could still be adopted -- or adapted -- by any hacker&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
group seeking to target iPhone users. &amp;quot;How this proliferation occurred is&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
unclear, but suggests an active market for &amp;#039;second hand&amp;#039; zero-day exploits,&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Google&amp;#039;s report reads. &amp;quot;Beyond these identified exploits, multiple threat&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
actors have now acquired advanced exploitation techniques that can be re-used&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
and modified with newly identified vulnerabilities.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Read more of this story at Slashdot.&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
---&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
VRSS v2.1.180528</description>
   <pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2026 21:20:03 -0600</pubDate>
   <link>http://mail.vadvbbs.com/web-bbs/forums/forum-viewmsg.php?t=39&amp;d=3&amp;m=91</link>
   <guid>http://mail.vadvbbs.com/web-bbs/forums/forum-viewmsg.php?t=39&amp;d=3&amp;m=91</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title>OpenAI Is Developing an Alternative To GitHub</title>
   <description>From:    VRSS @1 *1&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
To:      All @ *0&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Subject: OpenAI Is Developing an Alternative To GitHub&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Feed: Slashdot&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Feed Link: &lt;a href=&quot;https://slashdot.org/&quot;&gt;https://slashdot.org/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
---&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Title: OpenAI Is Developing an Alternative To GitHub&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Link: &lt;a href=&quot;https://developers.slashdot.org/story/26/03/04/0039214/openai-is-developing-an-alternative-to-github?utm_source=rss1.0mainlinkanon&amp;utm_medium=feed&quot;&gt;https://developers.slashdot.org/story/26/03/0...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
OpenAI is reportedly developing a code-hosting platform that could compete&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
with GitHub, The Information reported on Tuesday. &amp;quot;If OpenAI does sell the&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
product, it would mark a bold move by the creator of ChatGPT to compete&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
directly against Microsoft, which holds a significant stake in the firm,&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
notes Reuters. From the report: Engineers from OpenAI encountered a rise in&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
service disruptions that rendered GitHub unavailable in recent months, which&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
ultimately prompted the decision to develop the new product, the report said.&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
The OpenAI project is in its early stages and likely will not be completed&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
for months, according to The Information. Employees working on it have&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
considered making the code repository available for purchase to OpenAI&amp;#039;s&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
customer base.&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Read more of this story at Slashdot.&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
---&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
VRSS v2.1.180528</description>
   <pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2026 19:20:03 -0600</pubDate>
   <link>http://mail.vadvbbs.com/web-bbs/forums/forum-viewmsg.php?t=39&amp;d=3&amp;m=90</link>
   <guid>http://mail.vadvbbs.com/web-bbs/forums/forum-viewmsg.php?t=39&amp;d=3&amp;m=90</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title>Google Chrome Is Switching To a Two-Week Release Cycle</title>
   <description>From:    VRSS @1 *1&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
To:      All @ *0&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Subject: Google Chrome Is Switching To a Two-Week Release Cycle&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Feed: Slashdot&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Feed Link: &lt;a href=&quot;https://slashdot.org/&quot;&gt;https://slashdot.org/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
---&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Title: Google Chrome Is Switching To a Two-Week Release Cycle&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Link: &lt;a href=&quot;https://tech.slashdot.org/story/26/03/03/2040230/google-chrome-is-switching-to-a-two-week-release-cycle?utm_source=rss1.0mainlinkanon&amp;utm_medium=feed&quot;&gt;https://tech.slashdot.org/story/26/03/03/2040...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Google is accelerating Chrome&amp;#039;s major release cadence from four weeks to two&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
starting with version 153 on September 8th. &amp;quot;...our goal is to ensure&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
developers and users have immediate access to the latest performance&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
improvements, fixes and new capabilities,&amp;quot; says Google. &amp;quot;Building on our&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
history of adapting our release process to match the demands of a modern web,&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Chrome is moving to a two-week release cycle.&amp;quot; The company says the &amp;quot;smaller&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
scope&amp;quot; of these releases &amp;quot;minimizes disruption and simplifies post-release&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
debugging.&amp;quot; They also cite &amp;quot;recent process enhancements&amp;quot; that will &amp;quot;maintain&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
[Chrome&amp;#039;s] high standards for stability.&amp;quot; 9to5Google reports: There will&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
still be weekly security updates between milestones. This applies to desktop,&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Android, and iOS, while there are &amp;quot;no changes to the Dev and the Canary&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
channels&amp;quot;: &amp;quot;A Chrome Beta for each version will ship three weeks before the&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
stable release. We recommend developers test with the beta to keep up to date&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
with any upcoming changes that might impact your sites and applications.&amp;quot; The&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
eight-week Extended Stable release schedule for enterprise customers and&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Chromium embedders will not change. Chromebooks will also have &amp;quot;extended&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
release options&amp;quot;: &amp;quot;Our priority is a seamless experience, so the latest&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Chrome releases will roll out to Chromebooks after dedicated platform&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
testing. We are adapting these channels for the new two-week browser cycle&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
and we will share more details soon regarding milestone updates for managed&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
devices.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Read more of this story at Slashdot.&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
---&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
VRSS v2.1.180528</description>
   <pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2026 17:20:04 -0600</pubDate>
   <link>http://mail.vadvbbs.com/web-bbs/forums/forum-viewmsg.php?t=39&amp;d=3&amp;m=89</link>
   <guid>http://mail.vadvbbs.com/web-bbs/forums/forum-viewmsg.php?t=39&amp;d=3&amp;m=89</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title>LibreOffice Says Its UI Is Way Better Than Microsoft Office&amp;#039;s</title>
   <description>From:    VRSS @1 *1&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
To:      All @ *0&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Subject: LibreOffice Says Its UI Is Way Better Than Microsoft Office&amp;#039;s&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Feed: Slashdot&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Feed Link: &lt;a href=&quot;https://slashdot.org/&quot;&gt;https://slashdot.org/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
---&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Title: LibreOffice Says Its UI Is Way Better Than Microsoft Office&amp;#039;s&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Link: &lt;a href=&quot;https://tech.slashdot.org/story/26/03/03/1951222/libreoffice-says-its-ui-is-way-better-than-microsoft-offices?utm_source=rss1.0mainlinkanon&amp;utm_medium=feed&quot;&gt;https://tech.slashdot.org/story/26/03/03/1951...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
darwinmac writes: While many users choose Microsoft Office over LibreOffice&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
because of its support for the proprietary formats (.docx, .xlsx, and .pptx),&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
others prefer Office for its &amp;quot;better&amp;quot; ribbon interface. These users often&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
criticize LibreOffice for having a &amp;quot;clunky&amp;quot; UI instead of the &amp;quot;standard&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
ribbon interface you would find in Word, Excel, and other Office apps. Now,&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Neowin reports that LibreOffice is fighting back, arguing that its UI is&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
actually superior because it is customizable, with several modes such as the&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
classic toolbar interface, an Office-inspired ribbon layout, a sidebar-&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
focused design, and more. Furthermore, it argues that there is no evidence&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
that the ribbon offers &amp;quot;superior usability&amp;quot; over other interface modes.&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
LibreOffice says in a blog post: Incidentally, the characterization of ribbon-&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
style interfaces as &amp;quot;modern&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;standard,&amp;quot; used by several users, is not&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
based on any objective usability parameter or design principle, but is the&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
result of Microsoft&amp;#039;s dominance in the market and the huge investments made&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
when the ribbon was introduced in Office 2007 as a new paradigm for&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
productivity software. The idea that &amp;quot;modern&amp;quot; equals &amp;quot;similar to a ribbon&amp;quot; is&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
a normalization effect: the Microsoft interface has become a benchmark&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
because of its ubiquity, not because of its proven advantages in terms of&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
usability. Added to this is the fact that many users evaluate office software&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
through the lens of familiarity with Microsoft Office and consider deviation&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
from it as a problem rather than a design choice. Before this, LibreOffice&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
had also criticized its competitor OnlyOffice, accusing it of being &amp;quot;fake&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
open source&amp;quot; because it believes OnlyOffice is working with Microsoft to lock&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
users into the Office ecosystem by prioritizing the formats mentioned earlier&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
instead of LibreOffice&amp;#039;s own OpenDocument Format (ODF).&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Read more of this story at Slashdot.&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
---&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
VRSS v2.1.180528</description>
   <pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2026 16:20:03 -0600</pubDate>
   <link>http://mail.vadvbbs.com/web-bbs/forums/forum-viewmsg.php?t=39&amp;d=3&amp;m=88</link>
   <guid>http://mail.vadvbbs.com/web-bbs/forums/forum-viewmsg.php?t=39&amp;d=3&amp;m=88</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title>Meta&amp;#039;s AI Display Glasses Reportedly Share Intimate Videos With</title>
   <description>From:    VRSS @1 *1&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
To:      All @ *0&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Subject: Meta&amp;#039;s AI Display Glasses Reportedly Share Intimate Videos With&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Feed: Slashdot&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Feed Link: &lt;a href=&quot;https://slashdot.org/&quot;&gt;https://slashdot.org/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
---&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Title: Meta&amp;#039;s AI Display Glasses Reportedly Share Intimate Videos With Human&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Moderators&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Link: &lt;a href=&quot;https://yro.slashdot.org/story/26/03/03/1926214/metas-ai-display-glasses-reportedly-share-intimate-videos-with-human-moderators?utm_source=rss1.0mainlinkanon&amp;utm_medium=feed&quot;&gt;https://yro.slashdot.org/story/26/03/03/19262...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Engadget: Users of Meta&amp;#039;s AI smart&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
glasses in Europe may be unknowingly sharing intimate video and sensitive&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
financial information with moderators outside of the bloc, according to a&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
report from Sweden&amp;#039;s Svenska Dagbladet released last week. Employees in Kenya&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
doing AI &amp;quot;annotation&amp;quot; told the journalists that they&amp;#039;ve seen people nude,&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
using the toilet and engaging in sexual activity, along with credit card&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
numbers and other sensitive information. With Meta&amp;#039;s Ray-Ban Display and&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
other glasses with AI capabilities, users can record what they&amp;#039;re looking at&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
or get answers to questions via a Meta AI assistant. If a wearer wants to&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
make use of that AI, though, they must agree to Meta&amp;#039;s terms of service that&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
allow any data captured to be reviewed by humans. That&amp;#039;s because Meta&amp;#039;s large&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
language models (LLMs) often require people to annotate visual data so that&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
the AI can understand it and build its training models. This data can end up&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
in places like Nairobi, Kenya, often moderated by underpaid workers. Such&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
actions are subject to Europe&amp;#039;s GDPR rules that require transparency about&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
how personal data is processed, according to a data protection lawyer cited&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
in the report. However, Svenska Dagbladet&amp;#039;s reporters said they needed to&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
jump through some hoops to see Meta&amp;#039;s privacy policy for its wearable&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
products. That policy states that either humans or automated systems may&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
review sensitive data, and puts the onus on the user to not share sensitive&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
information.&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Read more of this story at Slashdot.&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
---&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
VRSS v2.1.180528</description>
   <pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2026 15:20:03 -0600</pubDate>
   <link>http://mail.vadvbbs.com/web-bbs/forums/forum-viewmsg.php?t=39&amp;d=3&amp;m=87</link>
   <guid>http://mail.vadvbbs.com/web-bbs/forums/forum-viewmsg.php?t=39&amp;d=3&amp;m=87</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title>OpenAI Amends Pentagon Deal As Sam Altman Admits It Looks &amp;#039;Slopp</title>
   <description>From:    VRSS @1 *1&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
To:      All @ *0&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Subject: OpenAI Amends Pentagon Deal As Sam Altman Admits It Looks &amp;#039;Slopp&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Feed: Slashdot&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Feed Link: &lt;a href=&quot;https://slashdot.org/&quot;&gt;https://slashdot.org/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
---&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Title: OpenAI Amends Pentagon Deal As Sam Altman Admits It Looks &amp;#039;Sloppy&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Link: &lt;a href=&quot;https://yro.slashdot.org/story/26/03/03/1918247/openai-amends-pentagon-deal-as-sam-altman-admits-it-looks-sloppy?utm_source=rss1.0mainlinkanon&amp;utm_medium=feed&quot;&gt;https://yro.slashdot.org/story/26/03/03/19182...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
OpenAI is amending its Pentagon contract after CEO Sam Altman acknowledged it&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
appeared &amp;quot;opportunistic and sloppy.&amp;quot; On Monday night, Altman said the company&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
would explicitly restrict its technology from being used by intelligence&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
agencies and for mass domestic surveillance. The Guardian reports: OpenAI,&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
which has more than 900 million users of ChatGPT, made the deal almost&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
immediately after the Pentagon&amp;#039;s existing AI contractor, Anthropic, was&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
dropped. [...] The deal prompted an online backlash against OpenAI, with&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
users of X and Reddit encouraging a &amp;quot;delete ChatGPT&amp;quot; campaign. One post read:&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&amp;quot;You&amp;#039;re now training a war machine. Let&amp;#039;s see proof of cancellation.&amp;quot; In a&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
message to employees reposted on X, the OpenAI CEO said the original deal&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
announced on Friday had been struck too quickly after Anthropic was dropped.&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&amp;quot;We shouldn&amp;#039;t have rushed to get this out on Friday,&amp;quot; Altman wrote. &amp;quot;The&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
issues are super complex, and demand clear communication. We were genuinely&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
trying to de-escalate things and avoid a much worse outcome, but I think it&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
just looked opportunistic and sloppy.&amp;quot; Upon announcing the deal, OpenAI had&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
said the contract had &amp;quot;more guardrails than any previous agreement for&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
classified AI deployments, including Anthropic&amp;#039;s.&amp;quot; [...] However, observers&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
including OpenAI&amp;#039;s former head of policy research, Miles Brundage, have&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
queried how OpenAI has managed to secure a deal that assuages ethical&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
concerns Anthropic believed were insurmountable. Posting on X, he wrote:&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&amp;quot;OpenAI employees&amp;#039; default assumption here should unfortunately be that&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
OpenAI caved + framed it as not caving, and screwed Anthropic while framing&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
it as helping them.&amp;quot; Brundage added: &amp;quot;To be clear, OAI is a complex org, and&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
I think many people involved in this worked hard for what they consider a&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
fair outcome. Some others I do not trust at all, particularly as it relates&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
to dealings with government and politics.&amp;quot; In his X post, he also wrote that&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
he would &amp;quot;rather go to jail&amp;quot; than follow an unconstitutional order from the&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
government. &amp;quot;We want to work through democratic processes,&amp;quot; Brundage wrote.&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&amp;quot;It should be the government making the key decisions about society. We want&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
to have a voice, and a seat at the table where we can share our expertise,&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
and to fight for principles of liberty.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Read more of this story at Slashdot.&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
---&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
VRSS v2.1.180528</description>
   <pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2026 14:20:03 -0600</pubDate>
   <link>http://mail.vadvbbs.com/web-bbs/forums/forum-viewmsg.php?t=39&amp;d=3&amp;m=86</link>
   <guid>http://mail.vadvbbs.com/web-bbs/forums/forum-viewmsg.php?t=39&amp;d=3&amp;m=86</guid>
  </item>
 </channel>
</rss>
