AT2k Design BBS Message Area
Casually read the BBS message area using an easy to use interface. Messages are categorized exactly like they are on the BBS. You may post new messages or reply to existing messages!

You are not logged in. Login here for full access privileges.

Previous Message | Next Message | Back to Friendly Debate (18+ please)  <--  <--- Return to Home Page
   Networked Database  Friendly Debate (18+ please)   [1831 / 2000] RSS
 From   To   Subject   Date/Time 
Message   Mike Powell    DIGIMAUS   Re: Socialist "Democrats"   December 1, 2025
 10:53 AM *  

> When I was working at the Mountain Home (TN) VA Hospital, the American
> Federation of Government Employees union was pestering me to join them.
> Besides offring additional insurance, they held no advantages for me
> over the government benefits  already had...and why there is a union for
> government employees is beyond me;..I never had issues with the pay or
> benefits I was receiving.  Thankfully, union mmbership was optional.

Some unions are just for things like (additional) insurance.  They really
don't operate like the "mandatory" ones.  They may also provide some
grievance contraptions for those who believe they do have issues with pay
or benefits, but I wonder how effective those are in that type of union.

> Don't get me wrong, unions had their place and time.  But what
> advantages they offer now are seeminingly miniscule.

> There's even an IT union.  I laughed when I heard that.

Several years ago, one of our governors was getting a lot of support from
the unions.  They got in good enough that the administration allowed them
to try to unionize the employees... those that were not law enforcement or
teachers, which were already in unions.

Some classifications got to choose unions that were at least somewhat
related to the work they did, while others -- including IT -- were given
the opportunity to choose to join the United Auto Workers (???).  There
were some other off-the-wall choices like that.

IMHO, unions like the UAW wanted a piece of the pie because their workforce of
actual auto workers was going down.  The unions also wanted a piece of the
state employee retirement fund.  I think maybe the administration thought
it might be a good idea so they could get out of providing insurance -- the
unions would take that over.

It was an all-or-nothing employee vote.  We voted unionizing of state
employees down, so none of the unions in question got involved with state
government and it never came up again.

Mike

 * SLMR 2.1a * A Crucifix? Oy vey, have YOU got the wrong vampire...
--- SBBSecho 3.28-Linux
 * Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (618:250/1)
  Show ANSI Codes | Hide BBCodes | Show Color Codes | Hide Encoding | Hide HTML Tags | Show Routing
Previous Message | Next Message | Back to Friendly Debate (18+ please)  <--  <--- Return to Home Page

VADV-PHP
Execution Time: 0.0135 seconds

If you experience any problems with this website or need help, contact the webmaster.
VADV-PHP Copyright © 2002-2026 Steve Winn, Aspect Technologies. All Rights Reserved.
Virtual Advanced Copyright © 1995-1997 Roland De Graaf.
v2.1.250224