RM> I can understand that. Way back before it was all online I tried out
RM> a dating service, and they hooked me up with such totally wrong women

RM> I was an avid hiker, often riding a motorcycle many miles to areas
RM> with good hiking trails and then walk 10 or 15 miles on a Saturday.
RM> ..and the first woman they hooked me up with had major back problems
RM> and could barely walk across the parking lot.

AA>I'm surprised that they got the "match" wrong especially when you
  >mentioned those "avid" outdoor activities.

I think they had a lot more males using the service than females and
they were just cycling through them without really matching properly.

RM> The second lady I picked up in an older car in good shape for a
RM> daytime drink meeting and she, seeing my car, very quickly let me
RM> know that she was looking for someone who could buy her a house
RM> and take care of her, so she didn't want to 'waste her time'..

AA>Was she so bold as to say "waste her time"?

Probably more like there was no point in us dating.

AA>Let's face it, first dates, first impressions, *do* make a difference.
  >Maybe you should have rented a vehicle! <g>

I was just as happy to find out she was just looking for money, not
even willing to spend the time to get to know a person.

AA>Anyway.. looks like you weren't a
  >keeper for your own sake, and your vehicle betrayed you! 

What? I'm not pretty enough to attract women without using money
as bait?  B)

AA>So.. did you even have drinks and a worthwhile chat together?

I don't think we spent 20 minutes together, just long enough to
finish one drink. Neither of us wanted to waste our time, both
of us for different reasons..

We just met in the afternoon, it wasn't a dinner date. (Her idea)

---
 * SLMR Rob  * Is fire supposed to shoot out of it like that?
 * Origin: Capitol City Online (618:250/1)